Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sportsbook.com
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep (non-admin closure). Clear bad faith nomination from sock puppet user impersonating the administrator that blocked him. WilliamH (talk) 19:22, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sportsbook.com
- Sportsbook.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article is being used as promotion for the company. They are seeking to legitimize an unsavory reputation and optimize search placement by exploiting the Wikipedia brand. All verifiable content which does reflect positively on the company is vehemently removed. Since the authors do not wish to present an unbiased view of the topic, this violates the Wikipedia principle of NPOV and so should be deleted. Ricky6546549 (talk) 17:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep and welcome back Fadeintoyou. Article is sourced. Subject is one of the biggest Internet sportsbooks. The article could stand some improvement but that is no reason to delete it. Anyone who vies the edit history can plainly see that you and your sockpuppets have been edit warring. Enough. Goodbye now. ♣♦ SmartGuy ♥♠ (talk) 18:21, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Spare the beaureaucratic jargon and keep the debate factual please.Ricky6546549 (talk) 18:28, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep bad faith nom, user is a sock puppet and is impersonating the administrator that blocked him, User:Ricky81682 [1], see User_talk:Fadeintoyou, Talk:Sportsbook.com and Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Sportsbook.com_spammer. ▪◦▪≡SiREX≡Talk 19:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.