Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spirit of Vatican II

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Second Vatican Council#The "Spirit of Vatican II". It's already covered there. Whether to remove it from there also or whether to merge content from the history is up to editors, but there's clear consensus here against keeping. Sandstein 11:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spirit of Vatican II

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This just seems to be a whole lot of WP:SYNTH, there appear to be no sources that justify the "spirit of Vatican II" as a separately notable topic from Vatican II itself Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:35, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:35, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:35, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree that this appears to synthesize some vague idea from numerous sources that don't explicitly describe it this way. Too much WP:OR here, in my opinion. Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 22:46, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can’t see that there’s a topic here and I don’t think this even rises to the level of WP:SYNTH. It’s just a recitation of various uses of a phrase without any real indication that the various users had any consistent intention. Mccapra (talk) 03:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge back to Second_Vatican_Council#Legacy, which covers the same ground. I suspect that a mere redirect would be inappropriate. Peterkingiron (talk) 13:47, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.