Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Special When Lit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:24, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Special When Lit

Special When Lit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreleased film. No sources or indication of importance. — Timneu22 · talk 16:59, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep... Now that I have addressed issues, turning this poorly written article into THIS... a lot more encyclopedic and far better sourced. With respects to the nominator, this IS a released film which has won (minor) awards and has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:22, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep decent news coverage, wide festival acceptance. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:27, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.