Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solo (Mansell novel)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect (to Jill Mansell, the book's author). Due to low participation even after re-listing, this should be considered similar to a "soft delete" with no prejudice to undoing the re-direct. (non-admin closure) davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 04:00, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Solo (Mansell novel)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable novel; I'm not finding substantial third party coverage for this title. The offered reference is about the author, and her personal preference in books -- not about this title. Some content in the topic is about "Fast Friends", another novel by this same author; not about "Solo", the apparently intended topic. Mikeblas (talk) 14:31, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:53, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:53, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect although my searches found nothing good at all apart from this and my second choice would've been delete but this saves the history. SwisterTwister talk 06:21, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 13:30, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per above. I couldn't find anything. The Amazon page gives off the impression that the Sun reviewed it, but then it could just have easily have been one of those "praise for her work" type of sections. By large it looks like this is your typical early novel: it gets released and is largely ignored. The author goes on to become famous, but the early work is still largely skipped over in favor of the more recent stuff. If there are any sources out there the article can be restored, but I'm somewhat doubtful of this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:20, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.