Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Software effect processor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn, topic is notable and has a lot of sources CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 12:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)‎[reply]

Software effect processor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a neologism. Does not appear in Google search, Google news or in book literature (Google books, scholar, JSTOR, etc.) CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 12:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Software. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 12:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a neologism. Shepard 2013 discusses both hardware and software effects processors. The problem is that you are researching by phrase matching, so text like "there are an incredible number of external software and hardware effects processors available today"(Shepard 2013, p. 197) simply won't turn up for you.
- Shepard, Brian K. (2013). "Effects Processors: Polishing your sounds". Refining Sound: A Practical Guide to Synthesis and Synthesizers. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199922949.
Uncle G (talk) 13:46, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's on me then. This AfD is not valid anymore, but idk how to close this. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 02:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.