Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SignPlot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:59, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SignPlot

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Google News only has [1] which is limited circulation, WP:AUD. There are COI tags on the article but I am not going to evaluate that allegation here. Rs chen 7754 20:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Transportation, and United Kingdom. Rs chen 7754 20:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep After a quick google session, I managed to find a few secondary sources - I consider these RS, but they are narrow in scope to industry publication sand may not meet WP:SIGCOV. Ive worked them into the article for now. Cannot comment on COI tags, although the program's designer was also credited as a contributor to the NY art expo. Dfadden (talk) 23:59, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:43, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leave. I agree with the previous speaker. In any case, the article does not look like a commercial. In such cases, let's think about the sensations of a Googler. he will find the wiki article and read the information about the item that we have collected for him here. Or will not read if the article is deleted. Why do you always want to delete everything? — Preceding unsigned comment added by WhyWeAll (talk • contribs) 23:18, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. With changes since the nomination, seems to already be ok for GNG, and I think there may be even more sources beyond what DFadden found [2][3][4]. —siro χ o 11:31, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.