Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shuu (musician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –MuZemike 23:46, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shuu (musician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not finding notability sufficient for a stand-alone article for this musician; perhaps a merge/redirect is in order. Epeefleche (talk) 23:33, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —みんな空の下 (トーク) 23:44, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —みんな空の下 (トーク) 23:44, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete but create redirect for Shuu (not "Shuu (musician)") to Girugamesh. This tiny stub mostly duplicates info already included in Girugamesh, the subject's only source of notability, as far as I could find. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 00:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agreed that the band seems quite notable, though the members don't seem to have any press coverage outside of articles on the band as a whole. Not sure what the need for a redirect is, but it doesn't hurt anything. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 14:55, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I favor a merge per nom as is our usual practice with band members who are not so much notable themselves. Bearian (talk) 19:45, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would not be against a merge of any RS-supported relevant information into the band article. At the moment, however, there is no RS-supported text in this article.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:16, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not seeing sufficient coverage or sourcing to justify a self-standing article. --DAJF (talk) 02:03, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.