Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shrimadh Bhagvad Gita Rahasya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:29, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shrimadh Bhagvad Gita Rahasya

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NBOOK Edmondhills (talk) 08:54, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 15:07, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NBOOK. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 15:08, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NBOOK. 1. The book has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the book itself. Mentioned on the article page. 2. The book's author is so historically significant that any of his or her written works may be considered notable. Jyoti (talk) 16:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Dharmadhyaksha and Jyoti.mickey, author is very significant. - Vivvt (Talk) 17:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Now adequately referenced, proving notability. Notable work by notable person. Nomination can be withdrawn.--Ekabhishek^talk 12:05, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable. The nomination seems to be in bad faith. The nominator had edit dispute with the creator of this article on some other article.Shyamsunder (talk) 12:29, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.