Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shree Venkateshwara Devasthanam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 07:58, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shree Venkateshwara Devasthanam

Shree Venkateshwara Devasthanam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced item which has been moved to & from draft and replaced in main by the creator despite a request to submit for review. Thus, to avoid further 'move-warring' a discussion needs to be undertaken. Additional search revealed little if any, SIGCOV. Eagleash (talk) 22:28, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hinduism and India. Shellwood (talk) 23:14, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Couldn't find WP:RS. SuperSharanya (talk) 12:57, 28 March 2023 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE. ✗plicit 03:46, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:03, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discounting the comment by the blocked socupuppet, more input for establishing a consensus would be beneficial.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aoidh (talk) 00:28, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:30, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:46, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete wall of unreferenced text that is presumably taken from the temple’s own website. The “references” don’t link to the text and are either about Hinduism generally or don’t substantiate what the article says. The external links just show that the place exists. There is nothing here to show that it is notable - no in-depth coverage anywhere in reliable independent sources. Mccapra (talk) 07:11, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.