Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shree Vasupujya Swami Jain Shwetamber temple
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MBisanz talk 04:25, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Shree Vasupujya Swami Jain Shwetamber temple
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shree Vasupujya Swami Jain Shwetamber temple (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability of this temple. Fails WP:GNG. Such temples are in every street in India. Venkat TL (talk) 10:27, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 10:27, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 10:27, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 10:27, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 10:27, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
*Delete I tried to do a search but i couldn't find any sources apart from its Facebook page. Fails WP:GNG. Keriwands (talk) 14:04, 26 November 2021 (UTC) blocked sockpuppet
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 10:52, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:11, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.