Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shifuji Shaurya Bhardwaj

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Baaghi (2016 film). (Non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:31, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shifuji Shaurya Bhardwaj

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability. Draft was declined thrice at AfC earlier this year for notability concerns. See Draft:Grandmaster Shifuji Shaurya Bhardwaj. —MBlaze Lightning ^T 09:09, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: According to the deletion log, this article has been speedied four times this year already. —MBlaze Lightning ^T 16:52, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect-I hardly find him passing WP:ACTOR.Redirect to Baaghi (2016 film). Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 14:52, 23 December 2016

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 23:58, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect: not enough for a stand alone article, IMO, but a redirect seems like a reasonable solution. The redirect page could then potentially be protected to stop it from being constantly recreated without appropriate oversight (i.e. an unprotect request). Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 00:07, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:34, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.