Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shani Sanatan Dharma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:53, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shani Sanatan Dharma

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only hits I could find were for Sanātana Dharma/Sanatan Dharma, which is already part of the Hinduism article. This page was tangentially involved in an SPI ([1]), and this appears to be a non-notable derivative of some other religion, if it's not just a hoax (as I initially suspected). GAB^Hello! 16:38, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. At best, this is either a hoax that gets a ride from the name of a legitimate deity, or it's a new movement that has a long way to go before it becomes notable enough. At worst, it's a spammy article about a shameless business venture (a possibility that doesn't seem very remote given the titles of the books on sale from the apparently official website linked from the article: How to do Viral Marketing -The steps in making Business and Website Viral alongside Life Lessons from Jesus Reborn -A compilation of great articles by Jesus Reborn). Uanfala (talk) 19:12, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as this article is questionable and would need considerable improvements and I'm not seeing anything convincing to keep, best deleted and restarted when better. SwisterTwister talk 20:12, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Looks like a scam to me. Montanabw ^(talk) 08:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.