Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Midnight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Midnight

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is partially filled with nonsense, is a frequent vandalism target to the point that actual information is indiscernible from the garbage, and the original subject appears to fail WP:N and WP:V for having no reliable third-party references in the article. Ivanvector (talk) 00:23, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If you're going to claim someone has been featured in the Sun or on the BBC, you better be ready to prove it. It is not my responsibility to investigate your claim. DarkAudit (talk) 01:48, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are some Google news hits. I have not read them to determine whether they suffice to establish notability. Nothing that I saw from the Sun or BBC. Dlohcierekim 03:19, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Here is the BBC article: http://www.bbc.co.uk/birmingham/content/articles/2009/07/10/deaf_wrestler_feature.shtml Note that you can restrict a search on Google to a specific domain through the "site:" operator, so I searched on Google for "Sean Midnight" site:bbc.co.uk and found this item. -- Eastmain (talk) 14:07, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The nonsense and vandalism are not relevant to the deletion discussion. Those are amenable to judicious editing and if need be page protection. However, I do not see that this subject, even with a the BBC article contents, meets notability guidelines. Deafness is not a criterion for notability, nor is professional wrestling. I do not see evidence in the article of sufficient achievement to meet notability requirements, nor did I find sufficient coverage by reliable, third party sources, in terms of breadth or depth. Dlohcierekim 20:53, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The BBC has regional divisions covering local news in the UK, the article is from BBC Birmingham not the national news site (news.bbc.co.uk). Cassandra 73 (talk) 23:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Noted comment per Cassandra. Claim to notability is even weaker than it was. Dlohcierekim 22:23, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 12:38, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not notable--WillC 02:44, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I smell WP:VAIN to be honest. In no way notable. RICK ME DOODLE YOU DOODLE 03:24, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.