Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scanzoni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:02, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scanzoni

Scanzoni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page has not been edited in 6 years and is just a "may refer to" list. It should probably be merged or deleted. Dellwood546 (talk) 02:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Dellwood546 (talk) 02:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. A perfectly acceptable name list. You'll have to remind me where "not been edited in 6 years" is listed at WP:DEL#REASON. I don't seem to be able to find it. SpinningSpark 23:15, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Looks like a fairly standard surname list. I'm not clear on why this one should be deleted.--Cube lurker (talk) 14:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - perfectly good "dab" list. An argument could be made to use "hats" instead. Bearian (talk) 18:38, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • We don't redlink hatnotes per WP:REDHAT and the WWI general is currently a redlink. Also, the grandson of the gynecologist who has the same name as the general has an article on de Wikipedia and could also conceivably be redlinked. SpinningSpark 20:36, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:23, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, meets WP:NOPRIMARY. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:24, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep valid surname page. Nothing wrong with pages being dabs or name pages. Boleyn (talk) 16:07, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.