Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Say OK

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge and redirect (non-admin closure), No deletes, most were redirects. Leonard^(Bloom) 01:57, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Say OK

This article doesn't have any relevant information. If Sneakernight was deleted, I think that should happen the same with this article Voices4ever (talk) 21:15, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The song charted, so it's notable. -- Eastmain (talk) 21:18, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 21:18, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to parent album: Simply charting does not justify an article. Per WP:MUSIC: A separate article is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album.. I think this article is unlikely to grow beyond a stub. Dribbled around at #61 and below.
Kww (talk) 21:26, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep : as per Eastmain. Europe22 (talk) 21:37, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to parent album per WP:MUSIC. insufficient material to warrant a separate article at this point. Ohconfucius (talk) 04:36, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to parent album as per Kww and Ohconfucius. (Voices4ever) 19:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to V (Vanessa Hudgens album) - not enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article. --Amalthea (talk) 23:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - a charting single, by a very notable singer --T-rex 23:05, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
merge to the album. All information in the article can be moved to the album article, and can be spun out again at a later time if it would become to large. There would be no loss of content. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:22, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.