Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Tamura

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:NSKATE as pointed out by the participants. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades^Godric 13:44, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Tamura

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing evidence she meets WP:GNG. Web searches show no significant coverage, just competition results and event coverage by hometown paper. Doesn't meet WP:ATH as subject has not competed at the highest level of the sport. - Quoting this from an earlier PROD. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:49, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As I pointed out earlier (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sarah_Tamura&action=history ), she meets the criteria of WP:NSKATE: Competed in the free skate at an ISU Championship. Hergilei (talk) 00:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:01, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:01, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above and WP:NSKATE. She did indeed skate in a free skate (finishing 13th) at a world junior. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:18, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - If something doesn't have many search results, this doesn't nesscisarily make them non-notable. She is notable, and shouldn't be deleted. Ethanlu121 (talk) 12:54, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.