Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sapience Analytics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 22:53, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sapience Analytics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:PROMO. Strongly promotional article. Persistent and obvious issues with COI editing of the article. Looks like the encyclopedia has been mistaken for a business directory. Dolescum (talk) 22:53, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:59, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:59, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 04:00, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Corporate spam against WP:NOTSPAM. Lacks coverage in independent and reliable sources. Careful analysis of the sources will show they are all one (in substance) promotional materials themselves. They are: "Sapience is promising start up" (7 instances); "Sapience is ranked this and this..." (7 instances also) then the remaining are "Sapience partners this and adopts this" This is prime example of WP:SPIP generated by press releases and some references are merely called (duplicated). No real independent coverage of the company per se to meet WP:CORPDEPTH–Ammarpad (talk) 03:50, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:06, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.