Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salaf in favor of Nikah Mut'ah after Muhammad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. L Faraone 03:48, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salaf in favor of Nikah Mut'ah after Muhammad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be an indiscriminate list which violates WP:INDISCRIMINATE; even as a category, this would be suspect. The fact that it also quotes from numerous primary source material appears to be a violation of WP:NPOV; the intent seems to be to push a certain opinion regarding Nikah mut'ah. One of the many creations of User:Striver, whose similar random articles on hadith have previously been deleted for similar reasons. MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:27, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator per User_talk:MezzoMezzo#Deletion_of_the_articles_related_to_Mut.27ah. MezzoMezzo (talk) 11:08, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:31, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 05:46, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Seems to push the OR rather heavily and the usage of primary sources is easy to abuse. Since nothing will be left in this case, it is best to delete. Secondary sources are required for interpreting and discussing such controversial matters. Editors should not fulfill this role. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:18, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the hadith is an important tradition and hence an article relating to it is warranted. If anything is required is improving the article and adding more citations.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider^tc_s 08:34, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 19:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move I think we can find better and more NPOV title which include both supporting and opposing cases and add more information about the scholars viewpoints. This can be a sub-article of Nikah Mut'ah. --Seyyed(t-c) 08:29, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Query The problem isn't just the title, though; the whole article is original research. I tried searching and I can't find anything reliable, nor can I find anything at all indicating the notability or any other justification for such a list. But by sub-article, what are you suggesting? I don't follow but it might be a better resolution, so could you elaborate on whether you mean a separate, standalone list or some sort of category or something else? MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:04, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We can make an article on Hadith related to Mut'ah and merge and redirect all of such articles to it. The problem of reliability can be solved in the talk page of that article better than a AfD.--Seyyed(t-c) 07:45, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I see what you're saying now. Do you suggest that I retract the AfD nominations? MezzoMezzo (talk) 07:54, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.