Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahadeo Tiwari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 02:46, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sahadeo Tiwari

Sahadeo Tiwari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No reliable links to support need of this persons bio on Wikipedia. Should be removed MBest-son (talk) 22:58, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep Actions for which notability is claimed are long enough ago that it is reasonable to assume a gsearch won't verify them. Printed sources are listed in article; I'll AGF and assume they are good unless someone can show otherwise.--Fabrictramp (talk) 16:09, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep. A well sourced article on a notable subject. There is absolutely no requirement for sources to be online - it fact print sources are usually better than web sites as it takes much more effort and expense to produce them, so the fact that someone has bothered to do so is a strong indication of notability. For those that like to see online sources this snippet from Google Books confirms the subject's connection with the Sanatan Dharma Board of Control, so there is no question of this being any sort of hoax. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Article has numerous reliable sources attesting notability.Bakaman 02:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.