Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadayandi Temple

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Athoor. SpinningSpark 17:40, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sadayandi Temple

Sadayandi Temple (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It asserts it gets more than 100000 visitors in a day - but no refs. Bringing to AfD as although I couldn't confirm WP:N, and it has been in CAT:NN's backlog for 12 years, there may be something in another language that I have missed. Boleyn (talk) 12:55, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:19, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:19, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless someone pulls actual sources from somewhere, but as it is it should not stay. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 23:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete then Redirect to Athoor, per this source: [1]. The page doesn't pass WP:NBUILD with this source alone, but I was unable to find anything else reliable. Heartmusic678 (talk) 16:05, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. One source is not significant coverage. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Fails my standards, although it is claimed to be "the site of a major annual liturgical commemoration, ... or has been a major place of pilgrimage," because it passes only 1/2 a factor, and there's no evidence its fame has reached "beyond merely local or congregational interest." Bearian (talk) 16:19, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.