Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SEPTA Route 2

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Jtkiefer ^{T | @ | C} ----- 22:36, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

SEPTA Route 2

This is an entry about one of the bus routes that traverses Philadelphia from North to South. The entry merely list the bus stops and contains no further information. Wikipedia isn't a mirror for the SEPTA timetable. Pilatus 17:28, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete — NN So what's the notability criteria for bus routes and bus stations? — RJH 18:38, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Andrew pmk | Talk 19:10, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I would reckon that the make of vehicle can have an article, and in some cases the roads they traverse. The busstops probably already do have article, though I'm not sure they should. But the routes that happen to run along these roads and stops at the moment? No, they're constructs of the local authority and might not last till the end of the year. While they last, they're not encyclopedic anyway, even if they are informative. -Splash 20:25, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Transwiki to Wikitravel and delete. Only bus terminals and bus routes in Singapore are required to be kept. Zoe 21:21, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • Wikitravel uses the Creative Commons license, not GFDL, so a transwiki would only be possible with the express cooperation of the author. —Cryptic (talk) 07:45, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Zoe, from what I have read the Singapore bus terminals are major affairs with shopping centers attached, much like 69th Street Terminal in Philadelphia. The fact that the entry on 69th Street Terminal is woefully inadequate doesn't speak against the Singapore stations. Pilatus 17:27, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, this is merely a list of stops the bus visits and completely useless with a map to visualize it all. If people want to know where the bus goes, you check the time table at a bus stop, not an encyclopedia. - Mgm|^(talk) 21:43, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep or merge with the other routes and allow for expansion. JYolkowski // talk 02:13, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.