Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SEE-I

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:46, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SEE-I

SEE-I (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article lacks sufficient sources and is a possible violation of WP:NOT. I suggest deleting or draftifying. The creator has only two edits outside of this page. FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 02:46, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Education. Justiyaya 10:03, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unfortunately, not enough notability present as of now. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 16:08, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:53, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Primary sourcing and instructional tone = delete. Mangoe (talk) 03:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.