Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RybAxel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 07:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RybAxel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another tag team consisting of random midcarders thrown together for a few months, in the same tradition as such deleted articles as: Tons of Funk, 3MB, Kofi Kingston and R-Truth, and Team Rhodes Scholars. They achieved nothing of note and with Ryback being injured it's unlikely that they will become notable in the coming months. LM2000 (talk) 23:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 01:31, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.LM2000 (talk) 01:40, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I know nothing about them, but to help ensure that the outcome is based in policy, would anyone be able to comment on coverage in reliable, third-party publications? So far, we've got length of time together, amount accomplished, and injury status, none of which is based on the GNG. GaryColemanFan (talk) 01:53, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
All of that is part of WP:ENT, which these guys fail to meet. We have match reports but in the past we've needed more than that to cover WP:GNG concerns, especially for tag teams because all of this information is covered in their individual articles.LM2000 (talk) 02:05, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It seems a lot of the coverage (in reliable and non-reliable sources) focuses on this team's failure to make an impact, after being thrown together to solve the problem of two singles similarly falling short in their angles. It's a weird situation, when people are famous for not being hot enough. I'll have sleep on this before voting (though the individuals are certainly notable, for reasons other than failing). InedibleHulk (talk) 03:28, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, mentions of them in reliable sources are nothing more than match results. WP:ROUTINE. Nikki♥311 21:33, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing to show they are notable as a team. No significant coverage.Mdtemp (talk) 18:45, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.