Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Runcorn Indians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 01:34, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Runcorn Indians

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NTEAM. A low-level club with no indication of notability. A few notable players have passed through, but as stated in WP:NTEAM: the notability of an athlete does not imply the notability of a team or club. –Aidan721 (talk) 00:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Baseball and Australia. –Aidan721 (talk) 00:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:14, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - agree with the lack of notability (many of the refs are primary, external links are dead, etc.) for the club rather than the players. Kazamzam (talk) 12:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:11, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Subject plainly does not meet the WP:NTEAM or WP:ORG. User:Let'srun 01:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.