Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rufous-tailed Rock Thrush (in foreign languages)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 06:30, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rufous-tailed Rock Thrush (in foreign languages)

Rufous-tailed Rock Thrush (in foreign languages) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) –

Not a substantial article, content not especially relevant, and could if necessary be included in main article. Merging wouldn't create a useful redirect, so deletion seems the best option. Addhoc (talk) 23:52, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete seems like a speedy, as it is a page for the name of the bird in various languages. This is the English language wikipedia. -RiverHockey (talk) 00:17, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:BOLLOCKS Doc Strange (talk) 00:44, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. see also this Jimfbleak (talk) 15:01, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per RiverHockey and nom Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 20:56, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• I created it. I think it should be deleted, too, but I also think the Chinese name for this bird should be recorded somewhere. Since Jimfbleak undoes the Rufous-tailed Rock Thrush article when I add the Chinese without a thorough discussion, there was no choice except to create this page. As for this being the English language wikipedia, I don't understand how blocking foreign languages is useful to users of the encyclopedia, English speaking or otherwise. As an Internet-based encyclopedia, there is no need to ban useful information such as foreign equivalents. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wakablogger (talk • contribs) 22:55, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.