Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronan Coghlan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 22:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ronan Coghlan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An autobiography that fails WP:BASIC and WP:NAUTHOR. Listed sources fail WP:RS. A Google did not yield enough to ring the N Bell. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:12, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I am unable to find anything in reliable sources independent of the subject to support WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NBOOK. Disclosure: I have followed this here from a brief discussion in WP:FTN. As noted there by User:Dougweller, there is a potential COI in that the article was created by User:Ronancoghlan. Location (talk) 20:38, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - web search top results shows book store links and other social links, however I did find a National Library of Australia link related to his work [1], however not much else I could find that is reliable and provides significant coverage on the subject. ///EuroCarGT 20:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable autobiography. --Seduisant (talk) 01:54, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Insufficient coverage in reliable independent secondary sources to meet any of our notability guidelines. My own search turned up nothing substantial. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 02:16, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. and above. --Jersey92 (talk) 02:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable at all.--180.172.239.231 (talk) 14:47, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability. Didn't turn up any RS. - - MrBill3 (talk) 03:51, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Dbrodbeck (talk) 14:53, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.