Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Bhargava

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:21, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rohit Bhargava

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:NOT. References are all in context trade papers. Marketeer trying to subvert Wikipedia. scope_creep (talk) 01:54, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:58, 3 January 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete as entirely trivial and unconvincing as when I first saw it earlier today, nothing genuinely significant and the PR awards listed make it worse. SwisterTwister talk 23:40, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an obvious vanity page on an unremarkable subject. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.