Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberto Spinosa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:19, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Roberto Spinosa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Roberto Spinosa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be a notable artist. PepperBeast (talk) 16:32, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Obvious"? If you have some Spanish-language sources to help establish notability, please point them out. PepperBeast (talk) 15:18, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I already did. Read it. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:09, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's an unsourced page on a fan wiki, not WP:RS PepperBeast (talk) 15:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. But what it says is worth noting, and bears on this discussion. Given the number of awards and exhibitions, articles in Spanish language Ecuadorian newspapers would presumably exist.
Your comment that it is "unreferenced" conveniently ignores the content. Here is the English translation, which I shall delete as it will be deemed a WP:Copyvio. It's in the editing history. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:34, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't do that. It's unhelpful, and it's as much copyvio in the edit history as it is in the page content. PepperBeast (talk) 12:47, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete From the Costa Rica perspective (saw the notice in the Wikiproject page...), there isn't much or anything at all to establish this individual as relevant to Costa Rica, and doesn't seem his work is otherwise notable related to that country apart for having participated in an exhibition? The article in Spanish Wikipedia is also just a list of participation and awards. Even doing an image search on a couple of search engines, there aren't results about his visual work, it all points to lack of notability. --Roqz (talk) 22:33, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Independent sources do not establish that WP:ANYBIO is met. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:06, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 21:30, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I read Spanish, but the sourcing doesn't establish that he meets NARTIST despite the claims on the Wiki linked above. There's some conflation with the chess player as well. Star Mississippi 13:12, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:08, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Roberto_Spinosa&oldid=1079079312"