Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Stedall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 06:48, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Stedall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this did indeed get a considerable excerpt and photospread in the Daily Mail 2 years ago. The effort was wasted,because it apparently didn't sell any books. 9 library holdings total, which is ridiculously small for a popularized historical bio on a very familiar theme. DGG ( talk ) 04:19, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~Unsure~~ - I found a few sources here and there, but am unsure if those are reliable. Bearian (talk) 17:53, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The first, Book Guild Publishing, is his publisher, and the second a mere listings. There are similar listings on a variety of amateur history blogs, but no actual discussions even on such sources. DGG ( talk ) 18:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete therefore. Bearian (talk) 18:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find any reviews or coverage apart from the Daily Mail article. WP:AUTHOR requires multiple reviews. No indication of any other notability guideline he might meet. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:06, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.