Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Johnston (English Professional Wrestler)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 15:24, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Johnston (English Professional Wrestler)

Lacks reliable sources per WP:BIO. Notability claims stem from one appearance; even if the info about it could be reliably sourced, it wouldn't be enough to warrant an article. Bringing to AfD because I don't know if people apply WP:ATHLETE to professional wrestlers. gnfnrf (talk) 11:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not Delete, search around on google, I've seen his MySpace, he's a real Wrestler. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.209.105.18 (talk) 13:56, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, well short of notability. Deiz talk 14:23, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable. And yes, WP:ATHLETE is applied to professional wrestlers despite the sport's scripted nature. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 16:38, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 16:34, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, one appearance is definitely not notable. Nikki311 16:54, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete epic fail. And to the Blanking IP, seeing someone's Myspace does not demand an article on Wikipedia. Darrenhusted (talk) 14:47, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.