Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Hall (economist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. Robert 00:37, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Hall (economist)

Not noteworth +/- vanity. Ifnord 17:34, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: not noteworthy? How so? Aecis 17:47, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Hall is famous for coming up with new ideas and leaving others to develop them further He sounds noteworthy to me. Sonic Mew | talk to me 18:51, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. His academy memberships show that he has been deemed notable among his peers. Uppland 20:06, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. A professor in a sponsored chair at a major research institution had to be notable to get there (plus per above). — mendel ☎ 20:50, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Has someone got it in for Economists this week - lst week it was violinists. Dlyons493 Talk 21:51, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fiddling the books? Keep, by the way. Tonywalton  | Talk 22:38, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per mendel. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:44, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• keep please it really does look noteworthy to me so how is this not supposed to be Yuckfoo 17:38, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.