Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religious liberalism in Rajput courts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:40, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Religious liberalism in Rajput courts

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a coatrack essay/synthesis and is not supported by the sources as claimed. Was created (without correct attribution) by merging three equally poor separate articles and pretty much has no links other than through what are now redirects from those articles. In all the years I have looked at this thing, I've never found sources that discuss the subject in any meaningful way. Sitush (talk) 05:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as per WP:ESSAY. Maybe worthy of a small mention in a parent article. Andrew. Z. Colvin • Talk 07:19, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as synthesis. The sources do not even mention "religious liberalism". Also, much of the article is aboutu dynasties that didn't use the self-designation Rajput, but are called "Rajput" anachronistically. utcursch | talk 17:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.