Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reed Infomedia India

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 13:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reed Infomedia India

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any WP:RS, although, as with many India topics, it may well be that they exist but they're just not showing up in my searches. Also nominating JCK (magazine), which is published by Reed; the two articles were created at almost the same time, by the same editor, who has a limited editing history and narrow scope of interests, so I'm guessing WP:COI comes into play. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 18:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 18:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no reliable in-depth sources. - Mfarazbaig (talk) 06:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'll give this another week to see of some of the stalwart editors from India can find anything
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:35, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom lacks WP:RS.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.