Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Shoes Unno

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 08:57, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Red Shoes Unno

Red Shoes Unno (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:ENTERTAINER. No significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Nikki♥311 22:25, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥311 22:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥311 22:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥311 22:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Pro wrestling referee with no significant independent coverage. Papaursa (talk) 19:46, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep has been a ref in main events for njpw wcw nwa — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.101.120.12 (talk) 13:25, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please tell me what notability criteria that meets? I'm not seeing any. Papaursa (talk) 01:12, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I've heard of this referee, which is more than I can say for most. Unfortunately that's not enough to satisfy WP:GNG.LM2000 (talk) 07:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• delete The keep argument is insufficient, as is the sourcing. Does not meet WP:NDlohcierekim (talk) 17:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.