Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Record Of Youth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 04:30, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Record of Youth

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and the subject is WP:TOOSOON ~ Amkgp 💬 12:07, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 12:07, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 12:07, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I would disagree that this is a case of TOOSOON, as the drama is verifiable and the subject of significant coverage in numerous reliable Korean sources, such as: Yonhap, Hankyung, Seoul Economic, and TenAsia, to name a few, which should be enough to pass GNG. While I understand that notability is not inherited, the fact that TV series features so many notable actors and actresses points to the likelihood for additional qualifying coverage to emerge soon -- Dps04 (talk) 17:13, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Salvio

12:42, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 15:36, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As above. - Seokgjin (talk) 05:51, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No point in deleting this excellent start today if the show will premiere in a matter of hours and will almost certainly be the subject of (additional) SIGCOV shortly thereafter, per the points above. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:35, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.