Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rated RKO

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 03:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rated-RKO

This team isn't notable enough yet Killswitch Engage 20:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Winning the tag titles and having the team name consistantly mentioned by the announcers is notable enough for me. However, if we're going to look at deleting short-lived tag team articles, we should also look at Shazarian. 131.230.135.105 21:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep while they may be farily new as a team they are tag team champions and not every tag team has done that. Also the members of this team are well established wrestlers who have both held word titles in the past. Its not as if two unknowns just formed the team. --70.48.172.195 01:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - they will be around for a little while, as they are feuding with DX. They will become notable, if they haven't already. Also, they are the current tag team champions. -- T H L^CCD 03:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Wikipedia has articles on such teams as The Two-Man Power Trip and Rock 'n' Sock Connection. Rated RKO clearly has as much information as the aforementioned articles. I'd agree to a precedent stating that WWE Championship holders are inherently notable. --RoninBK_ETC 11:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep They are the World Tag Team Champs. They should have there own page. - RYANonWIKIPEDIA
Keep' As per all of the above. They are the World Tag champs. Notable enough. Plus they are mentioned as the Team captains for one of the Survivor Series teams as 'Rated RKO' PhatePunk 05:06, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep For reasons stated above. ABricker 17:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep For reasons state above, but possibly move, as they've added more members, and may be forming more of a faction than a Tag team. BoBoCTiberius 02:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.