Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramadan-E-Kareem (Album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:38, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ramadan-E-Kareem (Album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable album. Article tagged for COI. CSD declined and PROD/AFD recommended. It is "expected" to release in July 2013. When and if it gains notability it may have an article here, just not yet Fiddle Faddle 09:32, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete The article also claims that it will be released in August, and one ref actually has an accessdate for August! The cited article claims it will be released 10 days before Eid. Also, how can a music video be an album?--Auric talk 12:46, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A reference in the New India Express has been added to the article. However, the album/video/production has not yet been released. Fiddle Faddle 10:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As the assessing CSD admin, I thought I should point out that I didn't recommend PROD/AFD (as listed above); If you check my edit summary, you will see that I said "Suggest PROD/AFD/Improve", as one should never forget that the route for a new article isn't always deletion. Stephen! ^Coming... 19:46, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 17:11, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:51, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails notability. If and when it's been out for awhile then it may qualify, but as of now it doesn't. Caffeyw (talk) 07:27, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.