Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raja Liaqat Ali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Raja Liaqat Ali

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Pakistani journalist. Fails WP:BIO as there is no evidence he has received significant coverage in independent reliable sources, despite puffery like, "In a short period he made everybody admit to his capabilities." An apparent autobio or COI article from users Raja.cj (talk · contribs) and Cj.Raja (talk · contribs). Contested PROD. Glenfarclas (talk) 19:48, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If somebody has not biography on Internet its not his mistake.Secondly Raja Liaqat Ali has been threatened by some people because of his profession.An example is there in this article as a column of Ayaz Amir.If this sentence doesn't suits here "In a short period he made everybody admit to his capabilities." then I can delete this sentence but overall deleting article will be unjust with author.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Raja.cj (talk • contribs)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:13, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:14, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lots of overblown puffery, but no indication of notability. Probably could have been Speedied. Edward321 (talk) 14:10, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 10:31, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:31, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not-yet-notable member of the working press. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:40, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.