Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prashant Nakti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 10:54, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Prashant Nakti

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article mainly has some paid/promotional sources and fails to demonstrate WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. There are some mentions in publications, but not in sufficient depth. Thilsebatti (talk) 14:50, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and India. Thilsebatti (talk) 14:50, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Took a while to get through Google Translate, but the sources do not add up to WP:GNG and subject fails WP:NMUSICIAN. Also, the conduct of moving something back to the mainspace with a disambiguated title after objecting to draftification is very familiar. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:44, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:52, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacks WP:SIGCOV. B-Factor (talk) 07:37, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As above. MisterWizzy (talk) 14:00, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per the reasons given above. Jeet Dev^talk 05:48, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.