Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poisonous Poets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted. There's no assertion of notability present. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 08:41, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Poisonous Poets

Fails WP:MUSIC, with no albums on a major label (or notable independent label). Not at AllMusic. Mikeblas 02:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:BAND. A few of the members may be mildly notable, but as nom mentioned, no allmusic profile and no albums on any notable label.--TBCTaLk?!? 03:01, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 04:11, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Zos 05:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Piss off with your censorship. they exist, dont they?

• Of course. I exist, and I shouldn't get an article yet. Speedy delete as completely non-notable (and no assertion of notability in the article.) Most of these rappers don't look notable either. Grandmasterka 05:21, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.