Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plus (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Plus (band)

Plus (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:DEL#8 Nightvour (talk) 05:43, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Nightvour (talk) 05:43, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One of their singles apparently charted in 2010 ([[1]]), so if I believe that is enough to usually satisfy the notability criteria. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 09:56, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: While this article is really lacking in sources, their Oricon profile shows that all of their singles and albums have charted and therefore pass WP:NMUSICBIO. lullabying (talk) 20:38, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as passes criteria 2 of WP:NMUSIC with albums and singles placed on a national chart, namely Oricon, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:58, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.