Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pilebunker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:16, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pilebunker

Pilebunker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A fictional weapon found in a few video games, generally attached to giant robots. There are no reliable sources out there for this fictional element. Gnews, gscholar, and gbooks have nothing referring to this weapon, and a general google search only comes up with unreliable sources, such as urban dictionary or yahoo answers. Rorshacma (talk) 22:42, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like useless information. After all, it is talking about a weapon that belongs in multiple video games, that as of yet can't be proven. Sky^Talk 23:36, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no sources, no signs of any notability even within the games, let alone in the real world. JIP | Talk 05:48, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete - The concept clearly exists, and it seems to be in several video games and fictional universes, but yea, there's just no notability there, and I'm not sure there ever will be. If this wasn't in a video game, it would be a simple case of WP:MADEUP - simply being in a video game doesn't magically make it notable. Runch (talk) 12:53, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.