Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillippa Williamson
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 17:35, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Phillippa Williamson
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Phillippa Williamson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Local politician in UK - Meets neither WP:POLITICIAN ("Just being an elected local official ... does not guarantee notability") or WP:GNG - where is the "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject"? - Most of the sourcing is routine or passing mentions. Paul W (talk) 15:46, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and England. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:54, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Probably delete. Plenty of news about her in the various local Lancashire newspapers, but nothing nationally that I can find. Qcne (talk) 16:15, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. County council is not a level of government that guarantees "inherent" notability per WP:NPOL — the notability test for a county councillor is not "she exists", but "her work on the county council has been externally analyzed by reliable sources to a depth and degree that would make her a special case of significantly greater notability than the norm for county councillors". But that's not what's being shown here, as the article is just written like a résumé, says nothing to suggest any reason why anybody outside of Lancashire needs to know about her, and is based almost entirely on primary sources rather than WP:GNG-building coverage. Bearcat (talk) 14:10, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:55, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.