Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Payshares

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 03:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Payshares

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this open-source platform has received any substantial, independent coverage to support its notability. Current sources in the article appear to be documentation of its systems and explanations of its services. I, JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 20:04, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete, 100% pure unmitigated spam as admitted by the spammer on Talk:Stellar (payment network). –Be..anyone (talk) 04:06, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up forum posts and developer's pages, but no significant RS coverage of this software. As above, clear promotion/spam.Dialectric (talk) 17:13, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.