Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Cartledge (Music)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:03, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Cartledge (Music)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While he's clearly worked on a lot of projects, I'm unable to find reliable, third-party sources covering anything he worked on in a prominent role. The article appears well-cited but the citations are primarily validating that [artist he worked with] exists, not that he worked with them. Googling about finds a couple of youtube links for commercials, but nothing third-party that can be substantiated. Ironholds (talk) 13:10, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep:- His work really give a clear indication that he is notable, but it is not necessary that all notable are published in media. Most of work seems to be before 2000 and even I cannot find anything significant for him. I will not prefer to vote for delete, my decision will be a weak keep. Ireneshih (talk) 14:30, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Ireneshih: ah, yes, actually, it is. That's the core of our notability guidelines. There are exceptions but he does not seem to fall under any of them. Ironholds (talk) 22:57, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:33, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:34, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:49, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:09, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.