Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paterson Square

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:56, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paterson Square

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs and completely non notable. scope_creep (talk) 00:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 04:05, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 04:05, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 04:05, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a non-notable commercial complex in Singapore. There is no historical/cultural/economic importance and there are not enough sources available to pass WP:GEOFEAT. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 04:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non notable shopping mall. Ajf773 (talk) 10:53, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable commercial shopping mall and no reference.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.