Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parascotopetl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Country of the Blind. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Parascotopetl

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find any reliable sources via Google. This should probably just be as part of the article for the story itself, rather than it's own article. Jrtayloriv (talk) 21:47, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fictional location with no independent sources to establish notability (or provide material for an article). The Country of the Blind says all there is to say about it. Deor (talk) 13:02, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Country of the Blind. Edward321 (talk) 15:05, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:59, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - another WP:NOTABILITY violation. December21st2012Freak Lord of the Vulcans 00:08, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Websters [1] finds the term significant enough to include as search terms. ~~Minimum~~ merge and redirect, ~~perhaps keep~~. Power.corrupts (talk) 20:27, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's a copy of the Wikipedia article we're discussing here—note the "[WP]" at the end. Those "Webster's Quotations, Facts and Phrases" books are an attempt to make money by reproducing content from WP and other free sources in dead-tree form and using the untrademarked name "Webster's" to suck in the rubes. Deor (talk) 20:33, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are absolutely right! I was concerned about the additioanl info in WP: "The name ..[[..]].. appears to be Nahuatl in form", which was not in Websters, but I find no sources, so I would dismiss it as OR. I would keep it as a plausible search term though, as the nominee suggests. Redirecting wouldnt even have to go throgh AfD. Power.corrupts (talk) 08:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Country of the Blind, which is the best alternative to deletion. This is a plausible target for the book. Cunard (talk) 00:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.