Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paper Sky (magazine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 14:49, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paper Sky (magazine)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparent spam, like its counterpart Mammoth. Biruitorul ^Talk 03:16, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete all as blatant advertising. Alexius08 (talk) 06:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Here's a reference: http://www.saipantribune.com/newsstory.aspx?newsID=73909&cat=1 -- Eastmain (talk) 18:07, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete That reference is way below the threshold of "significant non-trivial coverage", and the article is spammy. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:10, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I added another English-language reference which is available through AccessMyLibrary.com. To read the full article, you will need to enter your library card number. Bear in mind that most reliable sources about a magazine published in Japan are likely to be in Japanese. Nonetheless, I think the article now passes the general notability guideline. -- Eastmain (talk) 18:46, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Are you also going to completely re-write the article to address the other concerns? (the one's that are, you know, the whole reason the article was nominated) Beeblebrox (talk) 18:59, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 19:34, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 19:34, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I made some further edits to the article. -- Eastmain (talk) 03:23, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable magazine. Fails WP:RS and WP:N. Undead Warrior (talk) 08:45, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non notable. Oda Mari (talk) 07:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable spam by COI editor. --DAJF (talk) 09:25, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.