Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palestinian cause

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Even if there is a slight majority for delete, the term is still a useful redirect as it is a plausible search term - As I am a member of the I-P Collab project, I will submit my close to DRV upon request. (non-admin closure) Cerejota (talk) 06:40, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Palestinian cause

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing of substance. Most of the information is already available in Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Palestinian people Boycotts of Israel and of course Palestinian political violence. Looks like a clear case of WP:OR. I can't think of a comparable article for precedent. Wikifan^{Be nice} 04:58, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 06:11, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Nothing of any substance worth keeping in my opinion. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 06:20, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to Israeli–Palestinian conflict. This article contains no meaningful content worth keeping and is completely redundant with Israeli–Palestinian conflict, only titled in a way that would create a WP:POVFORK. Marokwitz (talk) 07:32, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: While the title and article aren't perfect, obviously there are a variety of Palestinian resistance organizations using different tactics and if Palestinian political violence is worthy of a topic, then the larger topic of Palestinian rights activism does seem worthy of one article, not just mentions here and there spread over a variety of articles like: Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Palestinian people, Boycotts of Israel, 2011 Israeli border demonstrations, List of Palestinian solidarity organizations, etc. CarolMooreDC (talk) 14:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The Palestine/Israel genre is flooded with enough unencylopedic articles. This one in particular is another blatant fork of Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Palestinian political violence - all of which address the "Palestinian cause" in a more balanced manner. There is nothing original in this article. Nothing of substance. Wikifan^{Be nice} 14:32, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? Palestinian cause is a fork of Palestinian political violence? So there's no activism that isn't considered violence if it supports Palestinians, now? Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:10, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; as Malik Shabazz points out, there's no substance here. While an article could be written on pro-Palestinian activism, there's nothing here to keep. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:10, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a fork of Israeli-Palestinian conflict. What's to merge? Carrite (talk) 17:20, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --GHcool (talk) 18:12, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are too many articles covering similar subjects. Anything not covered elsewhere can go in Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Zero^talk 05:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. It's still a valid search term. Nightw 22:57, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.