Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Padmnabhacharya swami maharaj

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 15:30, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Padmnabhacharya swami maharaj

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant violation of WP:RNPOV; turning this into an encyclopedic article would mean a rewrite. PROD by Mike Rosoft and me declined by page author. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:09, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Originally proposed for deletion by me with the reason: "Unreferenced, not written in the style of an encyclopedic article - religious claims presented as a fact". The reason still applies - the article's creator just removed the deletion notice without an explanation or any further changes to the article. Delete. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 13:40, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike Rosoft: to be fair, some references were added, though the citation style is not quite perfect. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:39, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|✉ 19:08, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|✉ 19:08, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 22:26, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.